|
Optimism is in the air as industry experts weigh in on
their opinions of the state of the distributed-generation
industry. Improvements in technology, a slowly reviving economy,
and a greater spirit of partnership between public and private
entities are granting distributed-generation projects a second
look. A renewed interest on both the state (California, New
York, Connecticut) and federal (Department of Energy) levels
means tax incentives to build a better bottom line.
In short, the industry is moving toward an upswing.
With the current price of natural gas, smaller cogeneration
projects remain an elusive option. But like other types of
distributed-generation projects, the outlook on future possibilities
is bright. Robert Miller, a third-generation mechanical contractor
and one of the pioneers of cogeneration, says he has always
found the concept not just intriguing but also viable. In
1988, he designed a cogen package under his former company,
ISI.
"The economics are nontraditional, and the concept
of cogen is still not universally accepted," Miller
says. "Too many projects are tasked with trying to do
a simple payback in two years, and that's just not realistic.
But things are tipping more in favor of this industry. With
natural-gas prices through the roof, they will cycle back
down at some point, making cogen more favorable. And there
is still a lot of pressure on utilities to ease up on regulations,
and many of them are doing it. That helps too."
Michael Edwards is the founding principal for the Power
Recruiting Group. With 12 years of industry experience, he
developed cogen projects before founding his staffing firm
in 1998. Having developed strategic and staffing plans for
distributed-generation companies, he cites a number of reasons
why distributed-generation projects are very viable, stressing
that they just have to be managed with caution:
"To be successful in cogeneration, firms almost
have to become a mini utility, but they can't have personnel
who have a utility-type mindset, and by that I mean the lack
of experience of performing in a hypercompetitive arena,"
Edwards says. "They fit very well into the demand side,
but on the supply side - especially the small supply side - most
personnel have not had the experience in being so aggressive
with the installation and operational/maintenance cost in
every single project. Similarly, those with an IPP background
can also have a difficult time because those projects are
so much larger and there is more wiggle room to manage the
project economics, and that's how they have been raised.
But with small distributed-generation types, you don't
have the luxury of making even a small economic mistake. It
will kill the project financially."
Straddling the fence between utilities and public and
private entities is no easy task, but Dan Rastler, technical
leader of the Distributed Energy Resource Program at the Electric
Power Research Institute (EPRI), is working hard to create
strategic partnerships to result in what he calls "a
win-win for everyone." He is currently leading improved
market integration pilot programs with selected utilities,
with the goal of improving integration of distributed-energy
resources within the electric enterprise.
"[EPRI] polled end-use customers - mostly commercial
and small industrial - last year, and we're finding
that the 300-kilowatt to less-than-10-megawatt customers are
more favorable to the idea of distributed-generation power
than they were the previous year," Rastler says. "Historically,
customers cite energy savings as the biggest driver, but we're
also seeing two others: more reliable power and more predictability
in energy costs."
Part of the growing acceptance of distributed-generation
power is an increase in the quality of the packages, which
in turn makes for a more reliable power source.
"The quality of packages has come a long way since
the early days," Miller says. "The engines are
more durable; the control systems are state-of-the-art. Efficiency
is vastly improved, probably around 25% on each project. In
the past two years, for example, Mann introduced a new line
of really great engines, especially as more people have gotten
into the natural-gas business of engines. Marathon has some
very efficient generators built specifically for cogeneration.
There are just simply better and more-efficient components
being built now."
David Olson, senior vice president for business development
at NexGen Power, a generation-project private equity firm
and a 27-year industry veteran who counts EPRI, New Energy,
and Honeywell as previous employers, consults on a wide range
of distributed-generation projects. Currently many of his
clients are working to combine renewables with distributed
generation, including finding new ways to use such enhancements
as digester gas technologies as sources of alternative fuel.
"Certain types of food-production facilities are
absolutely ideal for this type of application," he says.
"'I'm working on a project at a dairy plant
right now that originally had just a cogen component to it.
We are looking to add a production waste digester to the project
to capitalize on the organic waste, enhance the financial
returns, and make it a renewable-energy project. And [the
client] is just ecstatic."
Adding renewable components to distributed-generation
projects might yield tax credits, "green tags,"
and other enhancements, such as carbon or emission credits,
Olson notes, adding that such incentives "can only aid
and abet the project's bottom line."
Edwards agrees. "Many firms go into this with the
intention of building power plants strictly for commercial
buildings," he says. "You need something with
a 24/7 load profile, such as a hospital or data center or
a light- or heavy-industrial facility. If a project has little
heat recovery, economically that model doesn't pay out
in a reasonable amount of time. And if you can add a renewable
component to it, it's a slam-dunk. The economics will
be much better."
Distributed generation often is cited as a panacea for
an aging grid system, which, coupled with the California "rolling
blackouts," brought the challenge of power production
into the American consciousness.
"Some of our clients are looking at a T&D [transmission
and distribution] grid support application," Rastler
explains. "They have been squeezed so much in the past
few years that they don't have the money for infrastructure
improvements. Distributed power can be a potential solution
for certain applications."
"Just try to build a new major power plant today,
anywhere, and nobody wants you. People throw rocks at you,"
Miller adds. "Really big rocks. But guess what? This
also means there is a lot more opportunity for the distributed-generation
people, and distributed generation can offer an awful lot
of solutions."
"Our long-term vision is the integration of distributed
generation into the electricity enterprise," Rastler
concludes. "DG projects will provide an important role
in enhancing grid reliability and enabling end users to reap
energy efficiency and other benefits of onsite power interconnected
with the grid. We envision the future enterprise optimized
with other types of power, including nuclear, coal, and renewables - all
of which will have an important part in providing power solutions."
Based in Austin, TX, BONNY
BLOCK writes on a variety of technical and energy-related
topics.
DE - May/June 2004
|