|
No need to tell you that we've
experienced another year of upheavals in the power market,
or that their severity has been heightened by the inordinate
series of man-made and natural disasters that have rocked
the nation since the beginning of the new millennium.
Nothing should be more obvious to all business owners than
the risks associated with any loss of electrical power…particularly
when the outage may last for a protracted period of time.
You don't need any horror stories from me to know the terrible
impact this year's succession of hurricanes has had on Florida
and to a lesser extent the entire Southeast and Mid-Atlantic
Seaboard. Read any account of these events, and you won't
get beyond the first paragraph before you will be confronted
not only with the damage and destruction of wind, tide, and
floodwater but by the impacts of power loss as well. Already
we are seeing cost estimates ranging from $10 billion to $20
billion—in the final analysis it depends on who gets
to say what gets tossed into the pot—but for certain
such accountings tell only a part of the story for those who
have seen their dreams, aspirations, and sweat go down the
drain with businesses that failed as the result of downed
power lines.
While backup power may not be your
major reason for considering onsite power generation, it certainly
has its place in the decision tree, particularly if you live
and do business in areas prone to nature's violence, which
as we have seen is pretty much everywhere. It is one thing
to say to yourself, "Yes, with our increasing reliance on
computers and communications, my business would be dead in
the water without backup power," and quite another to see
in this "cost of doing business" an opportunity to stabilize
and perhaps even lower your overall costs. Yet in case study
after case study that we've presented this year, that's exactly
what we have seen. Moreover, in many of these cases the benefits
have been unanticipated, as shown most indelibly in the article,
"Not Your Usual Cogen Project:
A First for Heavy Industry" by David Engle in our January/February
2004 issue, where a relatively minor amount of onsite power
brought about a significant reduction in operating costs.
In the year since we began DISTRIBUTED
ENERGY,we've had the opportunity to watch some very interesting
projects come online, and good to our word we've been able
to present many of them in ways that should help resolve a
lot of the reservations those of you who are still working
through the options and issues associated with onsite power
selection have in determining your best course of action.
In this regard, of the 79 articles
we have presented to date, 53 have been case studies detailing
the challenges and opportunities others have faced in fielding
distributed energy projects. Consider our record so far:
- We've reported on projects
using wind, solar, diesel, natural gas, landfill gas,
sewage-water methane, bio stock, and hydrogen as fuel
for large and small turbines and internal-combustion engines,
along with several direct-use applications.
- We've looked at simple systems,
CHP systems, cogen, and trigen applications on the supply
side of the energy equation, as well as a half-dozen peak-shaving
and energy-demand-lowering approaches.
- We've looked at regulatory
and legal issues and assessed state and federal incentive
programs designed to jump-start distributed energy projects.
- We've delved into maintenance
issues and financing opportunities, and stuck our nose
under the tent of new technologies, renewables, and environmental
credits.
And this all took place as we were getting our feet wet in
a business that has been in a constantone might almost
say chaoticstate of change for the entire period.
So what does this say for 2005?
It's anybody's guess, but my crystal ball tells me that
we'll see a steadily increasing deployment of onsite power
systems coupled with adoption of energy-efficient systems
and practices in the face of uncertain but continually rising
fuel costs. Additionally I see utilities looking more favorably
on distributed energy practices not only to contain expansion
costs, but also to allow for maintenance and upgrade of
existing facilities.
If you believe as we do that distributed
energy is going to play an ever-increasing role in our business
and private lives, then DISTRIBUTED ENERGY is a great
place to get a project-level look at what works and, by inference,
a glimpse at what lies ahead.
Send John an e-mail
DE - November/December
2004
|