Editorial

In Pursuit of Continual Improvement

John Trotti

 

Over the past several months I've made it a practice to stick my nose inside the perimeter fencing of various job sites around the country, and I've found the experience most informative. I don't think it will surprise you when I report that while I recognized some regional differences (the result of climate and topography for the most part), what became apparent to me in due course was that most of them showed a similarity in their layout and the general way in which they operate.

In retrospect, I'm not sure I would have come to that recognition quite so quickly were it not from the handful of sites that - for lack of a better term - I would characterize as "haphazard." Though nothing more than casual snooping with no specific goals or guidepost on which to base my conclusions, I'm willing to bet that the impressions I take away are pretty good reflections of the actual state of affairs on these projects.

On one hand, these snooping exercises are the product of curiosity, but I've found the technique useful in a variety of circumstances throughout my life, such as when my wife and I, moving to a new town, were looking at schools for the kids. It dawned on us at some point that what we were looking for was not to be had by reading anybody's literature or being regaled by the wonders of this curriculum versus others. The issue came down to a matter of the product - what were the kids at a particular school like - and the only way to assess this was to look and listen to the kids themselves, not the teachers or administrators.

Similarly, in my military career, I found it valuable to visit other outfits to see what they were up to. Partly I would be looking for new ideas, but more importantly I was gathering impressions as a basis for developing a report card on my own unit. Even where I came away from one of these visits confident that "we" were in better shape than "they" were, inevitably I returned home with a clearer vision of our own strengths and weaknesses and with ideas for improvement.

Take the Nickel Tour

This leads me to recommend that you consider the practice of nonspecific snooping for inclusion in your bag of tricks, and if you are receptive to the notion, allow me to make a couple more suggestions for carrying it out.

First of all, review your own practices and procedures and then snoop your own operation. Ask yourself, "Do I like what I see?" and then, "How close do we come to doing what our procedures call for?"

Then go on a snooping expedition to other job sites, cautioning yourself not to be judgmental or too bound up in details but, rather, to take in the big picture. What is your overall impression of the site itself? Is it well laid out and organized? Is there adequate signage? Would you be able to make your way confidently and safely through it?

What about the workers? Are they busy? Are they properly attired? Do they seem to know what they're doing? Are they following standard safety procedures? Do they exhibit the characteristics of a team? Are supervisors present and doing their jobs?

How about equipment? Are the bulk of the machines operating or are they idle? Do they appear to be in good repair and well maintained? Do their operators use them effectively and efficiently?

There are tens, or hundreds, or even thousands more indicators you can find on any work site, all of which would add to your overall impression. My guess is that you could catalog them all and study them for a week and still not know much more than you would from what your first impression told you. What is important is that you take your impressions back to your own operation and see not only how you stack up, but also what improvements you can make based on the experience. What's interesting is that every time you do one of these snooping expeditions, you find yourself viewing your own operation with new eyes - the key to continual improvement.

Like to have a chance to win a Garmin E-Map mapping GPS? Then send me your feedback on this editorial. All those who finish the following sentences and submit them to jtrotti@forester.net by February 28, 2003, will be eligible for the drawing. Please type the word "E-Map" in the subject line.

You can tell that the contractor is in trouble when you look at his job site and see __________________________

and

You can tell that the contractor has his act together when you look at his job site and see _____________________

Send John an Email

GEC - March/April 2003

 

 

About | Subscribe | Current Issue | News | Events | Services
Register | Discussion  | Advertise | Contact Us | Search | Jobs

Erosion Control Magazine | MSW Management Magazine
Stormwater Magazine | Forester Communications

© 2001-2003 Forester Communications, Inc.