|

By Rodney
Garrett
Large construction
companies that have construction projects dotted throughout
North America generally engage equipment-transport contractors
to mobilize their equipment from project to project. The rationale
is that if the equipment must be transported hundreds of miles,
it is practical to use an equipment transport specialist.
Since most of the projects contracted by national contractors
last a year or more, the equipment mobilization costs are
modest compared to the contract income received by the contractor.
Compared to trailer
ownership, using equipment-transport contractors can be more
economical because there is no long-distance deadheading incurred.
Fixed overhead costs and operating costs from tractor/trailer
ownership exacerbate the deadheading problem because these
costs continue whether the trailer is transporting equipment
or not. Some of these costs include a truck driver, the fuel
consumed, and tractor-trailer maintenance, wear and tear,
and depreciation.
Nevertheless, many
of these same contractors also own equipment transport trailers
for delivering their equipment to projects that are in close
proximity their equipment yards. Different contractors have
different opinions on when it is feasible to use their own
transportation rigs. Most will opt for in-house equipment
transporting for projects that are 100 mi. or less while others
say 500 mi. is the limit.
Smaller contractors
generally own equipment-transport trailers for the same reasons
big contractors do. Most of these smaller contractors serve
a region or a part of a state, so the motive for using their
own tractor-trailers is one of time and cost savings. As for
time savings, a contractor usually can pick up and deliver
equipment to a site in a more timely fashion than can a third
party. That is, he can schedule, by the hour, equipment delivery
and pickups at a project that best fits construction schedules.
Ownership of an
equipment-transport trailer does not ensure a contractor efficient
equipment deliveries, however. Aside from efficient scheduling,
it depends on the trailer's configuration for efficient use
and how dependable the tractor and trailer are. For example,
contractor Ben J. Picarski recently bought a new hydraulic
detachable gooseneck trailer because his existing one had
become undependable. Picarski explains, "As the trailer got
more miles on it, it gradually became so unreliable there
were too many unscheduled downtime occurrences. Not only were
equipment deliveries to job sites delayed but other scheduled
construction work at the site was held up because carrying
out that work was dependent on the equipment to be delivered."
Trailer unreliability
was not the only reason why Picarski experienced inefficient
deliveries. The configuration of the old trailer was obsolescent,
making it problematic for hauling some of the equipment. To
illustrate, the trailer's flatbed length was too short for
satisfactorily positioning an articulated dump truck on it.
Articulated trucks are recent to Picarski's equipment fleet
and were not considered when he bought the first trailer.
To fit the articulated truck onto the trailer, one end of
the truck was placed atop the trailer bolster. This method
of loading a truck onto the trailer came at the expense of
excessive time taken to load and tie it down, relates Picarski.
The outcome of using the new reliable and better-configured
trailer is that seven equipment deliveries and pickups can
be made each day compared with five deliveries made using
the old trailer.
His company, Picarski
Inc., specializes in building-site preparation, underground
utilities installation, and private-road building. The company
is based in Gouldsboro, PA (Pocono Mountains), and rarely
contracts work beyond a 50-mi. radius, so the equipment is
transported relatively short distances.
Picarski Inc. is
modest in size, employing 20 people, including Ben's son Aaron,
who is a graduate engineer. The equipment fleet includes three
bulldozers, five hydraulic excavators, two articulated end-dump
trucks, three vibratory compactors, and two front-end wheel
loaders. Other equipment is rented as needed.
With so many different
types and sizes of equipment to transport, Picarski wanted
a trailer that could be used efficiently to load and haul
any piece. This prompted him to carefully evaluate different
brands for selecting one that best suited his needs. He considered
each trailer's design features, options, and purchase price.
Picarski found
that trailer prices range widely but correlate to the product's
build quality and the standard features and options offered
by the manufacturer. Generally trailers are custom built because
there are so many options for the contractor to choose from
and trailer dealers cannot justify stocking all the models
and their various options.
A downside to having
the trailer custom built is the build time involved. Depending
on how busy the manufacturer is, the contractor might have
to wait three to four months for a custom-built trailer to
be delivered. At best, long delivery dates are inconvenient
for most contractors.
Trailers
in the Carton
Fortunately, Picarski,
similar to some other contractors, does not need the multitude
of options offered by the trailer manufacturers. Jack Skinner,
a products manager for a Pennsylvania Caterpillar and Trail
King dealer, Cleveland Brothers Equipment Co., says the rules
on trailer buying have changed since Trail King recently introduced
its new-model Advantage trailer line.
Although Trail
King is and will continue to be a major supplier of custom-built
heavy-equipment transport trailers, the company realizes there
is a market for out-of-the-carton and ready-to-go trailers.
This new trailer line is virtually obtainable off a dealer's
lot, so there is little-to-no waiting time associated with
the purchasing and taking delivery of one. Only if certain
options are wanted does it take longer, but still not as long
a custom-built trailer. There are three Advantage models available
with payload capacities of 70,000, 80,000, and 110,000 lb.
A ready-made trailer
is not for everyone, claims Skinner. He points out that many
contractors need their trailers custom built because of their
specific equipment lineup to haul. "We find that many customers
will tolerate the build time necessary for custom-built trailers
because they want a trailer with specific options. One downside
to custom building a trailer is the higher purchase price
compared to the price of a new Advantage trailer. The build
quality of both trailers is equal. If a contractor does not
need a lot of options, the Advantage is a better buy."
Trail King says
it is offering the Advantage line to those contractors who
want to own a quality-built trailer yet require limited options,
if any. The cost savings comes from the assembly-line production
method used and fewer options available but not from compromising
build-quality standards.
Since Picarski
did not require a long list of options for a trailer, he decided
on an Advantage trailer instead of any custom-built one. The
design attributes and standard features offered on this trailer
met most of Picarski's requirements. "I seriously considered
another make of trailer before deciding on the Advantage.
There are other good trailer products on the market, but they
are the custom-build type. I looked at another make of trailer
because I am not loyal to any brand of equipment. I buy the
equipment that I feel best meets my requirements at the lowest
price, and the Advantage trailer was the winner," he explains.
Selected
Options
Picarski selected
some options that he needed now or in the foreseeable future.
With the emphasis on quicker delivery and more competitive
pricing, Trail King has limited the options available on the
Advantage line.
To accommodate
the present fleet of equipment and future equipment, Picarski
chose the Advantage model TK110HDG 110,000-lb.-payload-capacity
trailer, which can transport equipment bigger and heavier
than what is now in the fleet. Depending on future projects,
bigger equipment might be necessary. "Limiting the company
to one trailer, I think it best have the high payload capacity.
The heaviest equipment I have now is a Caterpillar hydraulic
excavator that weighs 74,000 pounds," he says.
Here are the trailer's
options chosen: Foremost are the air-ride suspension and apitong
wood decking. The air-ride suspension substantially reduces
road shock that is transferred to both the trailer chassis
and the equipment being hauled. The apitong wood decking was
selected for its superior warp and wear resistance compared
to an oak deck. The deck was increased from 24 to 25 ft. long
to accommodate the articulated dump trucks. To load and unload
track-fitted equipment easier, double-hinged, 31-in., front-loading
ramps were added for their peel-off resistance.
Other options include
a trailer-housed battery for operating the trailer lights
when a tractor is not connected, a hubometer for recording
the trailer's accumulative mileage, and maxi-brakes for an
added margin of safety.
There were some
other minor options included. Despite ordering the trailer
with the options, the build/delivery time was six to eight
weeks less than if a custom-built trailer would have been
ordered with the same options, according to Cleveland Brothers
Field Specialist Joe Revit.
Both Revit and
Skinner say that as more contractors become aware that they
can buy a high-quality trailer with fast delivery and for
less money, some will opt for it. Unless there are major design
changes to be made or many options wanted, the Advantage does
have the advantage. Revit says when comparing the Advantage
trailer with similar high-quality, custom-built trailers,
the contractor can save between 10% and 20% on the purchase
price.
Author Rodney
Garrett of Bernville, PA, specializes in construction subjects.
GEC - September/October 2003
|