|


By
Lanny Hickman
Our technologies and information
systems seem to expand exponentially every moment
of every day. There is so much to try to understand.
Didja ever wonder how lasers actually work? Didja
ever wonder how those huge aircraft carriers actually
float? The same question holds true with 747 jumbo
jets: how do they really get off the ground? How about
your VCR? Didja ever wonder why, even though the 125-page
owner's manual and "technical services" that you called
on an 800 number tell you how to watch one show and
tape another, you can seem to make it work? For those
of you who work in solid waste management with entry
dates around 1985 or later, didja ever wonder why
we do what we do today to manage, or mismanage, solid
waste? Maybe you really don't care; many readers probably
slept through history classes in school. But John
Trotti asked me for a guest editorial and I am taking
advantage of his bloody pulpit to answer a few "didja
ever wonder" questions about our business.
Didja ever wonder
how we decided that 6 inches of daily cover are just
right for a sanitary landfill? Back in the
1950s or so, when we were beginning to eliminate the
hundreds of thousands of open-burning dumps in the
United States with rudimentary sanitary landfills,
the question of how thick daily cover should be was
asked. Ralph Black, an unsung hero in solid waste
management, was tasked with answering that question.
His work showed that about 3 inches were adequate
to prevent adult flies from escaping a landfill. However,
a 3-inch cover was too thin for tracked vehicles to
travel over without re-exposing solid wastes. On the
other hand, a 6-inch cover was just right to prevent
re-exposure, and voilą, 6 inches became the standard
for daily cover.
Didja ever wonder
why twice per week became the collection frequency
of choice? It really had nothing to do with
the amount of solid waste generated. Twice-per-week
collection interrupted the life cycle of the common
housefly. Being prolific lovers and breeders, flies
can lay, hatch, and grow adult flies in about seven
days. Twice-per-week collection stopped that nonsense
and we were able to lessen the fly population in urban
areas, get the immature fly out to the landfill, and
bury it under 6 inches of daily cover.
Didja ever wonder
why the federal government has a solid waste program?
The feds' entry into solid waste management is tied
to the open dump, poliomyelitis, and worker safety.
The US Public Health Service (USPHS) charged with
protection of the nation's public health began in
the mid-1950s to study potential open dumps as a source
for the transmission of the poliomyelitis virus. The
presence of rats, mosquitoes, and flies at dumps made
them prime candidates for breeding grounds of the
virus. USPHS was able to trace flies from the dumps
to downtown, tying the open dump to disease vectors.
The organization also noted the high occupational
health threat to solid waste workers, especially collection
workers. These investigations led to a USPHS determination
that how we managed refuse/garbage was a health threat
requiring national action. This led, in 1965, to the
passage of the Solid Waste Disposal Act (SWDA), the
organic federal solid waste legislation. The act also
noted the waste of resources from the discard of materials.
SWDA established a federal solid waste program, the
precursor of the EPA solid waste program. The act
was subsequently amended several times - the Resource
Recovery Act of 1970, the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act of 1976, and the Hazardous and Solid
Waste Amendments in the 1980s.
Didja ever wonder
how automated collection came to be? Well,
out of the USPHS early work on worker health and safety
came an effort to reduce injuries to solid waste workers,
especially collectors. Funds were provided by USPHS,
especially to fund a project in Scottsdale, AZ. The
result was the birth of Godzilla and Son of Godzilla,
the first fully automated collection vehicles.
Didja ever wonder
why we use European waste-to-energy (WTE) technology?
The EPA solid waste program, formerly the USPHS solid
waste program, funded a number of studies to find
out why WTE was so successful in Europe and such a
bummer in the United States. Studies revealed that
the Europeans employed a systems approach where grate
manufacturers provided a complete package - build, install,
and operate a complete plant. This led to heavy promotion
of this approach in the United States by EPA and the
manufacturers. The European approach became the approach
of choice, resulting in a preemption of the traditional
US architect and engineer approach.
Didja ever wonder
why recycling took off in the 1980s? I don't
have an answer for this question; I myself am still
wondering. I am glad it happened, though, and I betcha
once we figure it out, we will be able to make recycling
grow into the dominant method of solid waste management.
Didja ever wonder
why we do not have a realist national materials use
policy? I don't have an answer for sure. However,
experience tells me that those who control the development
and utilization of materials in this country also
control those who can make national materials use
policies.
Progress
in solid waste management in the past 50 years or
so has been tremendous. We have moved away from labor-intensive
collection approaches, open-burning dumps, smoking
and toasting incinerators, and little salvaging. Today,
automated collection has arrived. Our sanitary landfills
are the finest in the world, and they serve as the
foundation for an integrated solid waste management
system. Our WTE plants are the most carefully controlled
plants on Planet Earth. Recycling has become a major
part of solid waste management. I wonder what the
next 50 years will bring?
Information
for this guest editorial was drawn from American
Alchemy: The History of Solid Waste Management in the
United States by H. Lanier Hickman, Jr., P.E., DEE,
and published by Forester Press.
Lanny Hickman is former
executive director of SWANA and a member of MSW Management's
Editorial Advisory Board.
MSW
- July/August 2004
|