In
addition to using the standard data collection and modeling, the
City of Philadelphia employs methods to establish new watershed
management plans that improve water quality and enhance the city’s
waterways.
By Joanne Dahme
and James T. Smullen
The
Philadelphia Water Department (PWD) - one of the oldest municipal
water departments in the United States - provides water treatment
and supply, wastewater collection, and biosolids recycling services
to the nation’s fifth-largest city, which has a population of more
than 1.4 million people. Its massive sewer network contains 1,600
mi. of combined sewers, 1,200 mi. of separate sanitary and storm
sewer lines, 150 mi. of intercepting sewers, 169 combined sewer-regulating
chambers, 84,600 manholes, and 75,000 stormwater inlets.
PWD
retained Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. (CDM) of Cambridge, MA, to
assist in implementing the city’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) combined sewer overflow (CSO) permit compliance program.
During the initial phase of the program, the team conducted a combined
sewer system inventory and characterization, performed a sewershed
hydrologic and sewer system hydraulic characterization, documented
the implementation of the nine minimum controls, and developed a
long-term CSO control plan. Ongoing activities include planning-level
support for the design and construction of some of the compliance
plan’s 17 capital improvement projects over the next five years
and a comprehensive effort to identify priority areas in the watershed
and actions to further improve water quality in Philadelphia’s receiving
waters.
Data
Collection and Modeling Are Foundation of Program
Initial CSO permit compliance
program activities included collecting technical, environmental,
institutional, and economic data; performing analyses to respond
to regulatory requirements; and developing sound, technically feasible,
and cost-effective water-quality improvement plans. The program
included a physical inventory and hydraulic characterization of
the combined sewer system, the development of hydrologic and hydraulic
models of the collection system, and a Geographic Information System
based on the city’s sewer infrastructure. Computer-based, mathematical
model simulations of rainfall-runoff and pipe-flow processes were
performed to characterize the sewer system’s response to wet weather
and to identify opportunities for increased capture and treatment
of wet-weather flows. Analyses were also initiated to assess the
water quality of the city’s tributary watersheds and to understand
the effects of all discharges on receiving waters.
Innovative
In-System Storage Application
 |
| Construction
of a deep tunnel conduit to be used to drain the wastewater
stored in the city's main relief sewer. |
 |
| One
of more than 180 combined sewer overflow points located in the
city of Philadelphia. |
One of the capital improvements
included in the long-term CSO control plan is a unique combined
sewage storage option - an inflatable rubber dam within the city’s
main relief sewer - to take advantage of existing in-system storage
capacity and to reduce CSO discharges to the Schuylkill River. Manufactured
by tire maker Bridgestone Corporation, the rubber dam will hold
back up to 4 million gal. of combined sewage until downstream interceptors
can convey flows for treatment at the southwest wastewater plant.
By implementing this technology, the city will achieve a 70% reduction
of overflows in this area. This alternative is the best way to optimize
storage capacity while minimizing costs to PWD and, in turn, to
the city’s customers.
Installed
near the historic Fairmount Water Works, the 13.5-ft. dam - the
largest of its kind - can be inflated in 15 minutes and deflated
in five minutes, allowing a quick response to a wide range of storm
conditions. Inflation and deflation of the dam are determined by
automated control logics, prepared for both dry and wet weather
conditions, with various redundant mechanical fail-safe features
intended to protect the system in the event of malfunction.
Associated
with the rubber dam installation is the boring of a 700-ft. tunnel,
which will connect the storage facility with a downstream combined
sewer interceptor. Automated sluice gates will allow the captured
combined sewage to drain to the treatment plant without compromising
the existing capacity of the interceptors to serve upstream sewage
transport needs.
Watershed-Based
Planning for Water Quality
Another important aspect
of the city’s long-term CSO control program is a watershed-based
planning and management approach to identify sources of potential
water-quality impairments in local water bodies and make recommendations
for improvements through the development of watershed management
plans.
PWD
has embraced a comprehensive watershed management program that minimizes
water pollution from all sources in a manner based on good science
and that achieves a sensible balance between ratepayer costs and
environmental benefit. Watershed management integrates the department’s
wet-weather programs - combined sewer overflow and stormwater management
- with a new drinking-water–source protection program. This concept
also takes full advantage of myriad pollution reduction, political,
and environmental goals to foster city and regional initiatives
that enhance the health of the region’s waterways and the public’s
perception of its environment.
Over
the past 30 years, management of water quality in the area’s streams
and rivers has largely focused on the control of water pollution
from regulated point sources: facilities that have pipes discharging
into the river. This was driven by the Clean Water Act requirements,
which caused the city and others to install the best pollution treatment
system available.
The
most significant remaining impact to the health of streams today
is from stormwater runoff, or nonpoint-source pollution. During
storm events, pollutants and sediment are washed into streams and
creeks from farms, backyards, streets, and construction sites. Exacerbating
this problem are hydrologic impacts caused by new developments,
primarily outside of the city, that increase flooding and the associated
environmental harms of erosion, siltation, and channel enlargement.
The resultant erosion of streambanks decreases the habitat of aquatic
life essential to healthy streams.
To
protect property and life from flood damage, improve water quality,
and still achieve environmentally sound land development, it is
now widely accepted that responsible land-use and stormwater best
management practices need to be coordinated on a watershedwide basis.
The comprehensive watershed management approach recognizes the various
causes of pollution and seeks a fair and equitable regional solution
to addressing water-pollution issues. Watershed management fosters
the coordinated implementation of programs to control all sources
of pollution, reduce polluted runoff, and promote managed growth
while protecting the region’s drinking-water supplies and recreational
activities (e.g., fishing) and preserving sensitive natural resources
(e.g., parks and streams).
PWD
has implemented an approach to water-quality management that seeks
to reduce water pollution from all sources in a manner that is based
on measurable results - be it improvements to the dissolved oxygen
and fecal coliform levels of the stream, streambank restoration
and the addition of riparian buffers to the adjoining park land,
or a mixture of both. These obvious improvements translate into
a fair and equitable distribution of the costs related to pollution
abatement and achieving water-quality goals. PWD has also engaged
urban and suburban communities to explore interregional cooperation
based on an understanding of the impact of land use and human activities
on water quality. To date, its efforts have been extraordinarily
successful.
Implementing
a watershed management approach is a complex task. It requires land-use
planning and coordination, the resources needed to model the pollution
sources in a water body, mutually agreed upon goals for the water
body, a cooperative regulatory climate, city and suburban dialogue
and agreement, and a consensus on a solution and the sharing of
costs.
PWD
has assumed a leadership role in moving the region toward operating
within a "watershed context." The programs are geared
to reconnect the city with its waterways, to make the streams and
parks valuable community assets that will induce citizens to join
in protection efforts. This is achieved by recognizing community
values and the importance of environmental aesthetics. It is recognizing
that rainwater is an urban asset and that the old solution of moving
water downstream as quickly as possible has resulted in the degradation
of hundreds of miles of urban streams. New solutions, which involve
more localized "green" development, can be aesthetically
pleasing, environmentally friendly, and less costly.
Tackling
this challenge has been greatly facilitated by PWD’s recent creation
of the Office of Watersheds. This organization is composed of staff
from the PWD’s planning and research, collector systems, laboratory
services, and other key function groups, allowing the office to
combine resources to realize the common goal of watershed protection.
The Office of Watersheds and CDM are formulating watershed management
plans for Philadelphia’s receiving waters. Initial efforts include
characterization of the physics and biogeochemistry of the Darby
and Cobbs Creeks watershed, identification of possible causes of
water-quality impairments, and suggestions for appropriate remedial
measures and management practices.
A
Strategic Watershed Partnership
The PWD-sponsored Darby-Cobbs
Watershed Partnership, which has been in place for more than a year,
is a consortium of proactive environmental groups, community groups,
government and municipal agencies, residents, and other watershed
stakeholders. PWD has established an active and vital watershed
partnership in the Darby-Cobbs watershed with the current focus
on the nontidal portions of the streams.
The
Darby-Cobbs Watershed Partnership was facilitated by PWD to create
a framework for all stakeholders in the 75-mi.2 watershed
basin to work together to find environmentally sound ways to improve
the water quality of Darby and Cobbs Creeks. Permit holders, participating
agencies, and community-based organizations are constructing this
framework upon regulatory and voluntary activities. To this end,
the partnership itself is a public-participation forum for participating
members to work together to develop a watershed strategy that not
only meets state and federal regulatory requirements but also embraces
the environmental/publicly sensitive approach to improving streamwater
quality and quality of life in communities.
As
one of the first steps in defining its framework, the partnership
developed a mission statement: To improve the environmental health
and safe enjoyment of the Darby-Cobbs watershed by sharing resources
through cooperation of the residents and other stakeholders in the
watershed.
The
partnership formed a public-participation committee to ensure that
the partnership identifies and recruits representatives of the diverse
array of stakeholders in this basin, including municipalities. Members
of the public-participation committee include representatives of
the following agencies/organizations: Philadelphia Water Department,
Fairmount Park Commission, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Heinz National
Wildlife Refuge Center, Pennsylvania Environmental Council, Cobbs
Creek Community Environmental Education Center, Delaware Creek Valley
Association, PA Department of Conservation and Natural Resources,
PA Department of Environmental Protection, Trail Boss Program, Delaware
County Planning Commission, EPA Region III, Delaware Riverkeeper
Network, Academy of Natural Sciences, Delaware River Basin Commission,
and representatives of the watershed’s 31 municipalities.
During
1999, the public-participation committee developed and published
a Q&A brochure titled "Darby-Cobbs Watershed Partnership"
to publicize its existence, raise awareness in the community about
watershed issues, and provide information on the public and private
organizations currently seeking to identify and address the sources
of water-quality impairment. This brochure was distributed to the
various partners to disseminate in their respective communities.
The
public-participation committee also formed an education subcommittee
to work with learning programs in the municipal school districts
and to identify existing educational resources and/or to suggest
the creation of resources that currently do not exist. This subcommittee,
in conjunction with the larger committee, also sought to identify
"action items" - that is, concrete projects that could
be completed in the near future. Following a brainstorming session,
25 potential projects were identified. The committee then voted
on the various projects to create a top 10 list to tackle. These
10 projects include, in the order of their ranking of importance:
1. Produce a watershed
status report based on initial technical committee reports.
2. Conduct a resident
survey of issues and awareness.
3. Hold an educational
symposium.
4. Develop a watershed
awareness video and public service announcements.
5. Develop other
educational/promotional materials.
6. Provide targeted
materials and workshops for the municipal audience - perhaps something
about stormwater Phase II regulations, best management practices,
stormwater ordinances, and so on.
7. Develop a watershed
Web site.
8. Collect or create
educational materials for municipal officials regarding watershed
management and tools to improve watershed stewardship.
9. Create or provide
access to teacher training opportunities.
10. Facilitate service
learning projects.
Project teams will be
created for each of these projects in 2000.
Looking
Ahead
Within the next five
years, PWD plans to have completed watershed management plans for
four of the five major basins, reconnecting the citizens of Philadelphia
with the city’s valuable waterways.
Joanne
Dahme is watershed programs manager for the Philadelphia Water Department,
and James T. Smullen, Ph.D., P.E., is vice president of Camp Dresser
& McKee in Cambridge, MA.
|